If China Wants To Avoid An All Out Cold War With The United States
Washington must not accept anything without the best interests of its country.
On November 16, Vice President Mike Bens strongly criticized China in a provocative interview with the "Second Air Force" and denied criticism of Trump's policy. When you do this, select an unnamed location since Eisenhower was in Washington.
"If China wants to avoid a full Cold War with the United States and its partners, it has to fundamentally change its behavior," said Burns, who was summarized by The Washington Post.
Few people believe that Beijing is willing to do so under the supervision of Governor Xi Jinping, at least in the near future. Of course, pessimism makes famous American observers nervous. Take Hank Paulson as an example. In remarks widely quoted in Singapore's new economy forum Bloomberg November 7, the seventy-fourth session of the United States and China's finance minister still "disengage", "World Iron Curtain Economic" warned the downward trend of the economy. The separation will have serious consequences.
"When about 40% of the world's GDP and the two countries more than 50% of global growth being cross-purposes, trying to make the integration of the two economies, as well as the establishment of an international system of fighting, I do not see the international system Paulson said: Does it last? "If the United States and China can not find a way to create a viable consensus, they will pose a huge global threat - not only to the global economy I am dealing with but to the international order and global peace we know." Trump's management: "China negotiates with ..."
Negotiations? Just because bets are too high does not mean "a viable consensus," Paulson said. At first glance, the compromise seems very likely. Xi Jinping and his deputy Wang Qishan recently said they wanted to talk to the United States, and Xi Jinping reiterated Beijing's commitment to the "open world economy." But does Xi Jinping and Wang really mean what they said? "Unfortunately, we've heard this news from Beijing hundreds of times before," wrote Dan Damico on the MarketWatch website on Wednesday. His title explains everything: "China always promises to stop commercial fraud, but it will never happen." Beijing has recently been unable to meet its trade commitments.However, there is another reason why negotiations can be of no avail regardless of the number of negotiations. Chinese rulers, who believe the state controls the economy and the market, will obviously not discuss the essential elements of the Chinese dream that he cherishes. This stubbornness is not just an ideological issue. Xi Jinping has many reasons and institutional reasons for not compromising. China's political system has changed, and only extremist views can be accepted.
In order to understand the reasons, we must remember that the trade talks in Beijing policy in the past few months revolve around the question "Who lost the United States?" This person is, of course, Jin Jinping. Loss of the United States will not become a political responsibility. If the United States is forced to join China, it is. However, if the United States does not join, many opponents of Xi Jinping - some of whom are also eligible to become "enemies" - will come out of the wood products and challenge it.
As the "absolute" ruler, Xi Jinping himself has been responsible for everything right or wrong. If he has a problem, he may lose everything. Xi Jinping seized power in the six years of the high level of the Chinese political system and removed the Communist Party from the system. Under Mao Zedong's rule, there were few rules that could guide party politics, which were evident in the decade-long cultural revolution. Deng Xiaoping, who took power from the successor chosen by Mao Zedong, began a long process of norm-setting and guidelines. Xi Jinping reflected this progress, especially earlier this year when he managed to try to lift restrictions on the presidency. He obviously wants absolute power. This ambition at home,
No one likes to bargain with other political factors, and no one will easily compromise with another determined person like Donald Trump. This brings us back to Vice President Pence. In the Washington Post-speech, he did not complete negotiations with Beijing - Trump and Xi Jinping plans on the sidelines of the G20 began to talk, held in Buenos Aires in late November - but Manchester Peng is hardcore location. This is the correct position taken by the United States. China must respect any agreement, and we must believe that it has no choice but to do so. How did you leave the United States Xi Jinping believes that he does not have such a choice? Benny has an answer.
"If China wants to avoid a full Cold War with the United States and its partners, it has to fundamentally change its behavior," said Burns, who was summarized by The Washington Post.
Few people believe that Beijing is willing to do so under the supervision of Governor Xi Jinping, at least in the near future. Of course, pessimism makes famous American observers nervous. Take Hank Paulson as an example. In remarks widely quoted in Singapore's new economy forum Bloomberg November 7, the seventy-fourth session of the United States and China's finance minister still "disengage", "World Iron Curtain Economic" warned the downward trend of the economy. The separation will have serious consequences.
"When about 40% of the world's GDP and the two countries more than 50% of global growth being cross-purposes, trying to make the integration of the two economies, as well as the establishment of an international system of fighting, I do not see the international system Paulson said: Does it last? "If the United States and China can not find a way to create a viable consensus, they will pose a huge global threat - not only to the global economy I am dealing with but to the international order and global peace we know." Trump's management: "China negotiates with ..."
In order to understand the reasons, we must remember that the trade talks in Beijing policy in the past few months revolve around the question "Who lost the United States?" This person is, of course, Jin Jinping. Loss of the United States will not become a political responsibility. If the United States is forced to join China, it is. However, if the United States does not join, many opponents of Xi Jinping - some of whom are also eligible to become "enemies" - will come out of the wood products and challenge it.
As the "absolute" ruler, Xi Jinping himself has been responsible for everything right or wrong. If he has a problem, he may lose everything. Xi Jinping seized power in the six years of the high level of the Chinese political system and removed the Communist Party from the system. Under Mao Zedong's rule, there were few rules that could guide party politics, which were evident in the decade-long cultural revolution. Deng Xiaoping, who took power from the successor chosen by Mao Zedong, began a long process of norm-setting and guidelines. Xi Jinping reflected this progress, especially earlier this year when he managed to try to lift restrictions on the presidency. He obviously wants absolute power. This ambition at home,
No one likes to bargain with other political factors, and no one will easily compromise with another determined person like Donald Trump. This brings us back to Vice President Pence. In the Washington Post-speech, he did not complete negotiations with Beijing - Trump and Xi Jinping plans on the sidelines of the G20 began to talk, held in Buenos Aires in late November - but Manchester Peng is hardcore location. This is the correct position taken by the United States. China must respect any agreement, and we must believe that it has no choice but to do so. How did you leave the United States Xi Jinping believes that he does not have such a choice? Benny has an answer.
Comments
Post a Comment