Britain can stop Brexit, but leaders want it?
Members of the European Parliament determined to vote for anything mentioning the Teresa Maya resignation agreement although it means that the risks the European Union. It’s official: Britain can stop Brexit if he wants to. This is under the judgment of a European Court of Justice (E.C. J), the body responsible for interpreting the laws and treaties of the European Union (EU).
The observer may seem like good news., Britain’s exit from the EU is not easy. Just yesterday, Prime Minister Teresa Mae, who was not getting parliament’s approval, announced his unpopular plan to export Britain from the European Union (EU) and encourage the House of Commons to killed to match the same level of anger, ridicule, and anger. country is undergoing the largest constitutional emergency since the abdication of the throne in 1936, and no one appears to be in power.
But when it published last month, they lifted an agreement on the exclusion politicians from all parties, including over one hundred members of the Conservative Party prime minister. He had little prospect of handing over to the House of Commons. Now we have encountered this, Venus’s credibility has undermined. It is unclear whether he will hold office for the longer or under any circumstances that Britain will now leave the EU (if at all).
In fact, Mayan opponents unfair blame. No version of Brexit can pass through the Commons at this moment. Two and a half years after Britain voted in a referendum to leave the EU, the European Parliament still divided on key issues such as the future Irish membership kingdom “feedback” in the Union’s unified market and customs, the urgent need for immigration controls and even whether Brexit is at risk
This internal statement on the departure of Britain from the European Union is threatening terrible consequences. The EU has stated that it does not intend to reopen negotiations, so the May transfer agreement is now the only starting point in the city. Unless they approve this agreement by March 29, 2019, Britain will step out of the EU through automatic law enforcement without approval to mitigate the blow. Almost everyone agrees that it will be a disastrous result.
The problem is that none of the British leaders want to cancel Brexit. At least no significant politician at the front has the courage to say. Only a strong minority of members of the House of Representatives calls this option. In addition, I can’t imagine a series of events that would include one of these so-called remains ( “Remote” for their critics).
From the point of view of British top officials, domestic politics is a strong headache for their appearance. In the country, 52 to 48 percent voted in favor of leaving the European Union in June 2016, and last summer, 90 percent of parliamentarians all parliament members, governors and employees ‘and unionists elected at the party platforms. Who committed to implementing Brexit? Although some parts of the country still support their residence in the European Union, it estimated that 75 percent of the conservative-dominated seats voted to go along with 61 percent of the seats occupied by the Labor Party.
What’s going on now? The default choice remains the departure of Britain from the European Union in March 2019, regardless of whether there is a formal agreement to withdraw from the treaty. There must be something positive to avoid the chaos that could cause such an “exit unbranded in Brexit”: the crisis at the entrance to Britain and the lack of food and medicine and the currency crisis, and more. This week’s most likely result was that enough House of Representatives will take up their nose and agree to a deal in May (or something close to it) to prevent Britain from disrupting disaster. The decision of the European Court of Justice complicates these calculations. Radicals can conclude Assassination now it is better to vote for any proposals to withdraw from the European Union or betting they agree in May or any successor Brexit cancellation instead of submitting to the Brexit disaster that does not include the deal.
The Hardliner Brexit may be encouraged to support an incomplete exclusion agreement if this meant at least a little of British outpouring from Brexit. At the moment, however, most of these Members seem determined to abandon something similar to the denunciation in May, even if this would risk putting Britain out of the “tough” EU. Obviously, they still do not see the possibility that “Britain has not come out of the EU” as a credible threat.
The only option is for London to ask the EU for an extension during which they can negotiate a new resignation agreement. The European Union has already said this result is not on the table, but it can convince European leaders to change their minds if, for example, the new government powers, and perhaps after a new general election or mandate to hold a second referendum. On Brexit. The path to resuming negotiations appears to a preferred plan for both the Conservative Party and the work.
That’s all irony. By deciding that Britain has unilateral authority to cancel its withdrawal from the European Union, the European Commission has confirmed that at least in this case Britain does not condemn everything that will approved by Europe. Instead, Britain has a clear and unpublished sovereign power to avoid the chaos of Britain leaving the EU. The only thing is that none of the British top leaders want to use this power. Whether the local political scene changes to another result is still visible.
