The US Government Hide Foreign Interference

Official authorities often hide foreign disputes rather than finding out the benefits of international involvement.

The Carnegie Council for International Affairs had the investigation team Ethics to review the domestic political support for the United States of America. One important point is the relationship between the National Security Expert community and the public.  As Croatia Shake held in June 2018, one fact is that “experts cannot influence the central states.” Different policy recommendations - It leads to expansion rather than reducing space.

In the last seven years, America is a trustworthy partner of Syria’s problem, which is the fate of Syria’s decision to “close the game” relative, not only Iran and Russia but also Turkey, Israel Compared with Qatar, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia. The risk offered by the Islamic State provides land to support solidarity, but for most Americans, they do not convince it that the United States is “trustworthy” to lose blood and wealth in Syria.

In recent years, we have seen in Syria and other places I and my colleagues half-called them as “the slope of the earth”. The approach “mix the slippers” and many, choose a different option from the menu, depend on a contractor with no pilot systems, nominated games (for example, US military personnel trained, or rotated For the purpose of billeting, and the ability to find special forces or intelligence workers and qualified agents also find a substantial number of workforce The goal is to maintain the number of “traditional” soldiers, which is the least possible number of battlefields. As for whatever reason, there are some psychological factors in the game, like the price point (the US $9.99 why we sell things rather than $10 because it seems there are hundreds of arrangements, but once we finish four numbers, the problem is increasing This evening will help explain Syria’s efforts to set up several US troops in Syria.

The Congress has to like the “field slope” approach, it protects which from the red line, which regulates legislation for law enforcement. They do not involve a few soldiers in the fight as its primary responsibility (but also as a trainer or support unit), Congress, the dangerous political position (keep in touching military action). Just as Hillary Clinton could prove to be in 2008, can determine political expenses, or take none action, and then take it because of the disaster). As we saw in the incident in 2017, Congress will not have to “monitor the fight against terrorism”, it will immediately punish the administration.

“A slaughterhouse on earth” is a satisfactory way of American political system, this government gives the advantage of the public utility. The US has made future suspicious doubts and engagement and operational tools because it is the balance. President Trump’s decision to make Syria’s return to the Syrian army has become anxious about the process. American political figures will again re-test the investment of time and energy at the beginning of the 2020 campaign, to support their priority approach to using American power in the world. The new argument is to submit.