If you want to speak well in public places, then stay calm
How does this understand? This is the same exact words, but convinced in
one case, in case of other boring, in other senses, in the other round,
and in other judges.
What will the difference does not sound,
nor the reader's presence, nor any utility? What is the difference
between them, at the top, the strength of their silence?
The word is written is not silent. In this paper, or sometimes a few grammar markers have a steady screen on the screen, coma, duration, and clip. it gives a reader an idea of reading it loudly. But does not solve the needs. Because the basic text or word does not arise. Creates basic use of silence.
It's easy with music. In this case, the translator belongs to the possibility of holding a note between the standing motion or the holding. But in the end, in this case, also, it will be the implementation of the personal result that will determine the difference between average garment and excellence.
Mute is silent speech.
Who wants to grab the spirit of text or speech in the hearts of the
listeners. Therefore, if you want to talk well, then it must be made its
owner.
In order to achieve this, we must be clear about what they have in the past: reflect past and reflect expectations for the future. The length of each break was called audience, in terms of consideration, allow the duration, or importance, or emotionally prepared that you will listen to it.
The biggest problem, when someone speaks openly is that they themselves feel. Especially in a country like us, where we do not learn how to do it. So we want to get rid of it as soon as possible. But because words cannot be less, what we do is keep silent. Everything goes here in hell.
One of the clearest issues is when we call politicians in Parliament. Because they have allocated some time, they try to do illegal things so that they can say more. But in general, to say more is to say at least, because their speeches often look like a strange adventure.
On the other end,
there are great speeches of history. Petrick Henry, one of them, is
particularly interested. It has also happened in Virginia for the
Virginia Conference and Monolugea in 1774, due to a huge emotional
passion, American people to take arms against the British. But the funny
thing is that in the end, nobody missed his words. In addition,
Jefferson himself, who was present, later wrote:
"This is Henry, the time he talked, while he was speaking, it was difficult to understand, everything seemed fine. They have talked against my opinion, have created a huge impact and me personally I am excited and happy. Since then, I have asked, "What about hell?" I can never answer this question.
It does not matter how much he asked, he could not find the right answer. Because the question was not what he said in hell. The real question, what was said and between, was quiet for how long.
The word is written is not silent. In this paper, or sometimes a few grammar markers have a steady screen on the screen, coma, duration, and clip. it gives a reader an idea of reading it loudly. But does not solve the needs. Because the basic text or word does not arise. Creates basic use of silence.
It's easy with music. In this case, the translator belongs to the possibility of holding a note between the standing motion or the holding. But in the end, in this case, also, it will be the implementation of the personal result that will determine the difference between average garment and excellence.
In order to achieve this, we must be clear about what they have in the past: reflect past and reflect expectations for the future. The length of each break was called audience, in terms of consideration, allow the duration, or importance, or emotionally prepared that you will listen to it.
The biggest problem, when someone speaks openly is that they themselves feel. Especially in a country like us, where we do not learn how to do it. So we want to get rid of it as soon as possible. But because words cannot be less, what we do is keep silent. Everything goes here in hell.
One of the clearest issues is when we call politicians in Parliament. Because they have allocated some time, they try to do illegal things so that they can say more. But in general, to say more is to say at least, because their speeches often look like a strange adventure.
"This is Henry, the time he talked, while he was speaking, it was difficult to understand, everything seemed fine. They have talked against my opinion, have created a huge impact and me personally I am excited and happy. Since then, I have asked, "What about hell?" I can never answer this question.
It does not matter how much he asked, he could not find the right answer. Because the question was not what he said in hell. The real question, what was said and between, was quiet for how long.
